tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post4489026016238678033..comments2008-04-13T19:36:23.336+08:00mcleehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03031139666690318823noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-55340464984918548452008-04-13T19:36:00.000+08:002008-04-13T19:36:00.000+08:002008-04-13T19:36:00.000+08:00多謝 scotie。不過很抱歉我並沒有收集他們的講稿或是 video clips，我也是興之所至的時候在 youtube 翻一翻而已。抱歉幫不上忙...mcleehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03031139666690318823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-75949280646193269342008-04-13T15:51:00.000+08:002008-04-13T15:51:00.000+08:002008-04-13T15:51:00.000+08:00版主您好<BR/>無意間逛到這個blog，看到很多篇言之有物，條理分明的好文，真是幸運<BR/>留個言為版主加油<BR/>看來版主有在留意hilary與obama的campaign，我最近想找hilary的演講來與obama做個對比，不知版主可有這方面的資訊<BR/>thanks~scotiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03506795096232443468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-34906580473634981452008-03-03T04:24:00.000+08:002008-03-03T04:24:00.000+08:002008-03-03T04:24:00.000+08:00FT <A HREF="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/758526dc-e877-11dc-913a-0000779fd2ac.html" REL="nofollow">有篇評論</A>在探討一些原因為何 Hillary 大意失荊州，隨手舉一例：<BR/>「...Mrs Clinton tries hard to fake sincerity – so hard it is painful to watch. Sometimes, in fact, I suspect that she really is sincere and only looks as though she is faking. Barack Obama, on the other hand, may actually be sincere – and if he is not, he fakes it so well it makes no difference...」stealthnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-42369785313360833662008-02-27T18:37:00.000+08:002008-02-27T18:37:00.000+08:002008-02-27T18:37:00.000+08:00這是西瓜效應啊<BR/>西瓜效應stealthnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-76839431531403855232008-02-27T18:24:00.000+08:002008-02-27T18:24:00.000+08:002008-02-27T18:24:00.000+08:00Willy: 謝謝。<BR/><BR/>nevercool：我當然可以說一堆「如果我是希拉蕊，我就會如何如何」之類的話。不過你我都不是候選人，太多嘴砲評論並不怎麼有意義，你說是吧？重點在不斷審查局勢的變化，然後追隨大趨勢的方向而已。<BR/><BR/>零：我同意局勢在 Texas 和 Ohio 出來以後會較為明朗，不過 Texas 以往支持 Clinton 的 latinos 這次似乎有些鬆動，傳統最支持希拉蕊的 Ohio，民調數字也逐漸被追平。歐巴馬聲勢節節高漲的現在，希拉蕊要怎麼說服 super delegates 她才是最佳人選可不容易。這也是為什麼我說希拉蕊局面大大不妙啊。mcleehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03031139666690318823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-66254127567280220812008-02-26T23:00:00.000+08:002008-02-26T23:00:00.000+08:002008-02-26T23:00:00.000+08:00單從最近Clinton最近更換競選經理和在演說中公開指責Obama歪曲其政策兩點就看得出Clinton陣營中的緊張氣氛。雖然Clinton現在形勢有點不妙,但目前兩人只相差約100個delegates,未來Texas and Ohio之後應該會比較明朗一點。暫是Clinton在Ohio的民調領先,所以這次應該結果還是拉鋸的延續。<BR/><BR/>能否勝出primaries, persistence 很重要,John Maccain就是一個例子。零http://www.blogger.com/profile/16678850863481006004noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-12713591385604998372008-02-26T22:21:00.000+08:002008-02-26T22:21:00.000+08:002008-02-26T22:21:00.000+08:00好文。<BR/><BR/>看了這篇文，感覺歐巴馬真的是定了個聰明的定位策略。<BR/><BR/>不過，我比較好奇的是，文章說：希拉蕊敗在沒看清局勢的變化。<BR/><BR/>那假如，希拉蕊看清了局勢的變化，那她又要如何重新調整自己的定位策略呢？nevercoolhttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/nevercoolnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-89751633991518963452008-02-26T22:02:00.000+08:002008-02-26T22:02:00.000+08:002008-02-26T22:02:00.000+08:00現在一時找不到當時的資料，不過印象中二次世界大戰之後，Republican 的提名人選是民調最高的人；Democrats 則是剛好相反，一開始民調最高的人最後都不會被提名。唯有一次例外stealthnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12351991.post-6615933044030476902008-02-26T14:54:00.000+08:002008-02-26T14:54:00.000+08:002008-02-26T14:54:00.000+08:00好文Willyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02707968802332922492noreply@blogger.com